Talk:underget

RFV discussion: June 2022–February 2023

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

underget

RFV two senses:

1. "(transitive, obsolete) To understand; perceive."
2. "(transitive) To receive; undertake; get at; find out." There are two current citations but they both look unambiguously like NNES error, and the 1998 one does not even seem to match the definition.

Note the OED only has hyphenated under-get, defined as "(transitive) To catch up with, overtake" and having a single citation from 1390. Equinox ◑ 16:45, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

I've split the entry into 2, 1 for Middle English undergeten, and another for Modern English underget. I did not add the senses above. If they are verified we can add them at that time I suppose. Leasnam (talk) 13:28, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

I don't understand: where did the previous revisions of the page go? I only see your latest changed revision in the history. Nothing shown for page deletion either. Equinox ◑ 14:50, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

It was moved to undergeten, then recreated at the original spelling. Chuck Entz (talk) 15:08, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Yes. Leasnam (talk) 18:56, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Looks  cited Ioaxxere (talk) 04:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

RFV Failed, the original senses were already deleted. Ioaxxere (talk) 22:21, 16 February 2023 (UTC)